<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Derek E. Silva &#187; Conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dereksilva.ca/tag/conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dereksilva.ca</link>
	<description>Working towards better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One Way Forward</title>
		<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2011/04/one-way-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://dereksilva.ca/2011/04/one-way-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Silva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dereksilva.ca/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada. Canada has survived and thrived over the past 144 years thanks to good leadership, determination, and vision. A vision of a nation designed to provide the most essential human rights we all deserve, while providing the opportunity for people to define their own destiny. But that ability is being threatened. Threatened the powers that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Canada</strong>. Canada has survived and thrived over the past 144 years thanks to good leadership, determination, and vision. A vision of a nation designed to provide the most essential human rights we all deserve, while providing the opportunity for people to define their own destiny. But that ability is being threatened. Threatened the powers that be who are willing to stifle our democracy, continue to widen the gap between the rich and the poor, and put additional tax burden on your daily lives. Taxes, both literal and figurative, that will come in the form of higher levies on blank CDs and DVDs, a stifling of innovation by the absolute demolishing of fair use laws, an inability to get the country connected to high speed internet, so-called “support” for students that only aggravates the problem many students already have paying back student loans, allowing more and more seniors to fall below the poverty line, superprisons for unreported crime, and funding cuts for organizations that support the victims of crime. And all this leaving the sandwich generation with less time and money to help their kids or look after their ill and aging parents.</p>
<p>It’s a dismal state that must be corrected.</p>
<p>Canadians need <strong>choice</strong>. Canadians need <strong>freedom</strong>. Canadians need <strong>security</strong>. And most of all, when things get rough, Canadians need <strong>support</strong>. What they don’t need is a government that is so eager to put them in prison that they’re going to spend billions of dollars on new American-style superprisons. What Canadians don’t need is a government that seems hellbent on turning us into a warmongering nation, spending billions of dollars on jets without engines, and forgoing our previously well-known reputation for being peacekeepers. What Canada doesn’t need, or want, is to leave our neighbours and families out in the cold when they need our help the most.</p>
<p>It’s high time we stood up for the country we live in. Now is the time where we must look to the future and decide what we want this country to look like, to act like at home and around the world, and how we want to be seen amongst our peers. We have a very serious choice to make, and it can make or break this country.</p>
<p>In order to survive and thrive in the next 144 years, this nation has but <strong><em>one way forward</em></strong>. We need to invest in <strong>ourselves</strong>, in our <strong>communities</strong>,  and in the<strong> way of life</strong> we hold dear. That means making decisive, wise choices in how we spend our money, how we treat the future leaders of this land, and how we treat those that are suffering.</p>
<p>We need to invest in our children and grandchildren. Students need genuine help getting to and through school, and that’s why the Liberal Party’s platform introduced the Learning Passport, providing up to $1500 per year for students that get the grades, and deserve to get a post-secondary education.</p>
<p>That’s why the Liberal Party platform <strong>brings back</strong> the deal it signed with the provinces, that was killed by Stephen Harper and the Conservatives, ensuring each province has the ability to get the funding they need in order to <strong>train </strong>new early childhood educators, <strong>create </strong>more childcare spaces, and <strong>help </strong>parents out in the way they need to most.</p>
<p>Canadians should have the right to take the time off work you need to look after your parents without being penalized for it. That’s why they want to create a new Family Care Employment Insurance Benefit, so that caregivers take six months off work to care for gravely ill family members at home; and on top of that a new Family Care Tax Benefit worth up to $1,350 annually, to help low- and middle-income family caregivers manage the costs associated with looking after their parents.</p>
<p>And, of course, those who need the healthcare system should feel comfortable knowing that it will be there to take care of them thoroughly, efficiently, with the best care possible. The federal government has to continue to work with the provinces to make that a priority now and in the future.</p>
<p>We need to <strong>expand </strong>and <strong>enhance </strong>the Canada Pension Plan, before it starts having the same problems the U.S. Social Security Plan has. Canadians need to know the CPP will be there for them, and will make a meaningful impact on their retirement lifestyles. Canadians have also been clear that existing retirement saving methods aren’t enough. That’s why the Liberal Party has proposed a Secure Retirement Option &#8211; an enhancement to the CPP that’s voluntary, leaving you with the choice to participate or not, and <strong><em>not run by the banks</em></strong>.</p>
<p>We need to ensure that affordable housing is available, that we leave this country and planet cleaner than it was when we came into it, where service to your community is recognized and rewarded, and where the arts get just as much respect as our office workers, construction workers, and doctors do. Canadians need to know that the food on their table not only tastes great, but is good for them and won’t make them sick. And rural Canada, in all its forms, finally get the respect it deserves from the cities it feeds.</p>
<p><strong>That’s the Canada you deserve</strong>. That’s the Canada I want to live in. Anything less is <em>unacceptable</em>.</p>
<p>And when we can afford it, <em>we will reduce taxes</em>. We will reduce personal income taxes. We will reduce business taxes. But we can’t go on running the country as if printing more money is the answer. This all has to be done responsibly and with a level head recognizing the situation for what it is, and the implications of where money comes from, and how it’s spent.</p>
<p>So join me in voting for a Canada we can all be proud of. Vote for your local Liberal candidate, and give them the mandate to turn this country around and into one that all Canadians can be proud of, and is once again respected on the world stage. Our livelihoods depend on it.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dereksilva.ca/2011/04/one-way-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper Promises Senate Reform</title>
		<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/harper-promises-senate-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/harper-promises-senate-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Silva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dereksilva.ca/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Stephen Harper today is pledging to move forward with reforming the Senate; namely making a Senate seat an elected position instead of an appointed one. For once, I agree with our dearest Prime Minster. However, I believe he should take it one step further. I just did a little reading on the Senate and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Stephen Harper today is pledging to <a title="globeandmail.com" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081015.welxnharper1015/BNStory/National" target="_blank">move forward</a> with reforming the Senate; namely making a Senate seat an elected position instead of an appointed one. For once, I agree with our dearest Prime Minster. However, I believe he should take it one step further.</p>
<p>I just did a little reading on the Senate and discovered that it has 105 seats. <strong>105</strong>! Why so many? The U.S. has 10x the population we do and each state only elects two Senators &#8211; one junior, one senior. Considering Ontario, the most populous province in our fair nation, has only 2 million more people than New York City, why does it need 22 more senators than the entire state of New York? It boggles the mind.<span id="more-28"></span></p>
<p>105 Senators getting paid $122,700 each (in 2006) equals $12,883,500 each year in taxpayer money going to people we don&#8217;t elect. Admittedly there are currently 16 vacant seats so we&#8217;re &#8220;only&#8221; spending $10,920,300 this year on salary for the Canadian Senate. If we moved to a structure where each province had 2 Senators and each of the territories had one, not only we would achieve a system that makes sense and is fair but it would also mean we have 23 Senators, ensuring we never have a tie as long as they all vote on each piece of legislation.</p>
<p>And not only do we cut out a lot of the fat, we cut down expenses! 23 Senators would only cost $2,822,100 a year! <strong>That&#8217;s a savings of $10,061,400</strong>!</p>
<p>People, <strong>this is the type of thinking we need in the PMO!</strong> Why isn&#8217;t Harper talking about downsizing the Senate? I&#8217;m all for electing my own Senators from Ontario, but we don&#8217;t need 24 of them represening the province! Also, is it just me or does $122,700 just scream &#8220;overpaid!&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/harper-promises-senate-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Federal Election</title>
		<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/2008-federal-election/</link>
		<comments>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/2008-federal-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Silva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dereksilva.ca/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I must say that I&#8217;m pretty disappointed in the results of last night&#8217;s election. While the Election Prediction Project was predicting that the election would actually hurt the Conservatives, instead they came out stronger than they were going into it.  Now holding a commanding 143 seats, only 12 short of the majority Prime Minister [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I must say that I&#8217;m pretty disappointed in the results of last night&#8217;s election. While the <a title="Election Prediction Project" href="http://www.electionprediction.org/2007_fed/index.php" target="_blank">Election Prediction Project</a> was predicting that the election would actually hurt the Conservatives, instead they came out stronger than they were going into it.  Now holding a commanding 143 seats, only 12 short of the majority Prime Minister Harper was looking for, I fear we&#8217;re in for a repeat of the past few years.</p>
<p>In fact, the only bright spot for me is that the NDP gained several seats. If you take a look at the CBC&#8217;s <a title="CBC.ca" href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/map/2008/" target="_blank">election map</a>, the NDP painted large swaths of the country orange last night. While heartening, especially when you see seats that the NDP took from the Conservatives, it&#8217;s still a reality that the Conservatives are more powerful now than they have been in over a decade. The amalgamation of the majority of the right-wing vote has done them well, and I must say they&#8217;ve also done well courting centrists.</p>
<p><span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p>Another thing I&#8217;m displeased about is the Green Party further splintering the vote on the left. They were able to come out with 6.8% of the vote nationwide which, although lower than every poll I&#8217;ve seen predicted, certainly took away from both the Liberals and the NDP. With the environment clearly a focus of the Liberals and NDP these days, I don&#8217;t see why the Green Party couldn&#8217;t dissolve and join the ranks of the other, far more entrenched parties. It would probably do a lot of good in pushing an environmentally-focused and healthy lifestyle-focused approach to some of the problems we face. For example, I&#8217;m not a naysayer to a <a title="The Green Shift" href="http://www.thegreenshift.ca/" target="_blank">carbon tax</a>, I just wish it was explained more clearly even before the election was called.</p>
<p>Stéphane Dion did a poor job of it and the Conservatives jumped down his throat about it. The true message was shut out, just like the NDP&#8217;s promise during the last federal election to cut everyone&#8217;s income tax by 1%. That would have made a much bigger difference to the majority of Canadians&#8217; pocketbooks and bank accounts instead of cutting the GST by 2%. But we are where we are now, and the only way is forward.</p>
<p>And so I hope that the next 2 years can bring some renewed focus on winning the House of Commons and the PMO back from the Conservatives. If we don&#8217;t, I&#8217;m afraid we may end up like the USA is today, and that&#8217;s a far scarier premise than I care to imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dereksilva.ca/2008/10/2008-federal-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

