<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Canadian Cities Should Be Doing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dereksilva.ca/2009/06/what-canadian-cities-should-be-doing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2009/06/what-canadian-cities-should-be-doing/</link>
	<description>Working towards better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online London -&#160;2009/06/21 - From My Bottom Step</title>
		<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2009/06/what-canadian-cities-should-be-doing/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Online London -&#160;2009/06/21 - From My Bottom Step</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dereksilva.ca/?p=128#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] A sampling of some of the local blog offerings that caught my eye this week. Do you know of a local blog that you think deserves inclusion in this weekly roundup? Let me&#160;know!  Blogger dies of exposure Do they speak English in what? Give peas a chance Historical tourism or commercialism? Information food groups Mathematics of wrong numbers Paul, there&#8217;s a difference&#8230; Tweeting your way into a Twinternship What Canadian cities should be doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A sampling of some of the local blog offerings that caught my eye this week. Do you know of a local blog that you think deserves inclusion in this weekly roundup? Let me&nbsp;know!  Blogger dies of exposure Do they speak English in what? Give peas a chance Historical tourism or commercialism? Information food groups Mathematics of wrong numbers Paul, there&#8217;s a difference&#8230; Tweeting your way into a Twinternship What Canadian cities should be doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picard102</title>
		<link>http://dereksilva.ca/2009/06/what-canadian-cities-should-be-doing/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Picard102</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dereksilva.ca/?p=128#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I would love to see the city require new development to have green roofs, and produce 10% of their own power consumption. But I think saying if Europe is doing something then so should we is kind of irrellivant.

Those trash cans are ugly as sin. You&#039;d have to cover them in ad&#039;s. I think the only benefit of them is having a decreased pick up schedule, you&#039;d not be able to replace the current waste bins through with a few of these as you need frequency to promote usage.

All services to the home should be remotely controled by now. Though I wouldn&#039;t want that control to be dependant on Rogers or any of the other telecoms.

Free transit would be nice, but I&#039;d be concerned with the quality of service if that ever happend.

Re: the video. I don&#039;t think changing the zoneing from residential to mixed use would serve to slow down the growth of the cities boundries. You&#039;d still destroy farms and forests to build these type of communities and at a similar rate. It&#039;s also a little odd to think people believe that you&#039;d have a school within 5 mins of you, in a town of 4,000 on a grid based layout, the high school was half an hour trip by car for most. In fact all throughout my schooling the nearest school wasn&#039;t in walking distance.

I also don&#039;t see being able to get the density you&#039;d need to support businesses in the neighborhood unless you focused on residential towers and not individual homes which most seem to prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see the city require new development to have green roofs, and produce 10% of their own power consumption. But I think saying if Europe is doing something then so should we is kind of irrellivant.</p>
<p>Those trash cans are ugly as sin. You&#8217;d have to cover them in ad&#8217;s. I think the only benefit of them is having a decreased pick up schedule, you&#8217;d not be able to replace the current waste bins through with a few of these as you need frequency to promote usage.</p>
<p>All services to the home should be remotely controled by now. Though I wouldn&#8217;t want that control to be dependant on Rogers or any of the other telecoms.</p>
<p>Free transit would be nice, but I&#8217;d be concerned with the quality of service if that ever happend.</p>
<p>Re: the video. I don&#8217;t think changing the zoneing from residential to mixed use would serve to slow down the growth of the cities boundries. You&#8217;d still destroy farms and forests to build these type of communities and at a similar rate. It&#8217;s also a little odd to think people believe that you&#8217;d have a school within 5 mins of you, in a town of 4,000 on a grid based layout, the high school was half an hour trip by car for most. In fact all throughout my schooling the nearest school wasn&#8217;t in walking distance.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t see being able to get the density you&#8217;d need to support businesses in the neighborhood unless you focused on residential towers and not individual homes which most seem to prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

